52.
still think someone shud count the irragulatiesthingies and update the count
| dswp.de http://www.dswp.de/old/ |
|
| southside anyone? http://www.dswp.de/old/charme-of-an-urt-player/southside-anyone-t2270-50.html |
Page 6 of 7 |
| Author: | manhut [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
50 wow already at 50 :O |
|
| Author: | natirips [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
51 since we had irregularities at the begining, but who cares anyway |
|
| Author: | BEH [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
52. still think someone shud count the irragulatiesthingies and update the count
|
|
| Author: | natirips [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
53 I tried and what happned: ___. |
|
| Author: | manhut [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
meh, this is good also. 54 |
|
| Author: | natirips [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
55 totaly agreed |
|
| Author: | wurst [ 06.19.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
0815-spam.com |
|
| Author: | natirips [ 06.20.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
56 (i) The point of this type of thread is to make a post with a number mentioned in the previous post +1. Typically the only other rule is not to post twice or more in a row. That would be overkilling it. Edit: Look what I got with "I'm feeling lucky" for "0815-spam.com": http://www.stopforumspam.com/forum/p5124-2009-08-15-3%3A27. Some nuub didn't get the charm of spamming. 
|
|
| Author: | manhut [ 06.20.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
57 Omg lol |
|
| Author: | natirips [ 06.20.10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: southside anyone? |
58 
|
|
| Page 6 of 7 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|