loook at my internet, my internet is amazing...

natirips · **Posted:** 11.02.10

wurst wrote:

Mega Basepaires.

I may be dyslexic but still, I first read that as "Mega Basepirates", and thought that was for counting .iso files.

wurst · **Posted:** 11.02.10

MBP = Mega Basis Piraten
nice idea...

wurst · **Posted:** 02.12.12

oki watch mine dick chicks!

N00bi · **Posted:** 03.12.12

wurst wrote:

oki watch mine dick chicks!

fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

eXtr33m · **Posted:** 03.13.12

Too high ping. Big dick = small erection

wurst · **Posted:** 03.15.12

no i have 11 ping!
...and ure jealous^^

Attachment:

ping.png [ 9 KiB | Viewed 8903 times ]

natirips · **Posted:** 03.15.12

Wow, maps.dswp.de sure responds fast.

Code:

natirips@nati-desk:~$ ping maps.dswp.de
PING maps.dswp.de (83.141.4.233) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from mapdownload.urt.dswp.de (83.141.4.233): icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=26.1 ms
64 bytes from mapdownload.urt.dswp.de (83.141.4.233): icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=26.0 ms
64 bytes from mapdownload.urt.dswp.de (83.141.4.233): icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=25.7 ms
64 bytes from mapdownload.urt.dswp.de (83.141.4.233): icmp_req=4 ttl=58 time=25.8 ms
^C
--- maps.dswp.de ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.714/25.929/26.112/0.236 ms
natirips@nati-desk:~$ ping www.google.com
PING www.l.google.com (173.194.35.180) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f20.1e100.net (173.194.35.180): icmp_req=1 ttl=56 time=31.6 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f20.1e100.net (173.194.35.180): icmp_req=2 ttl=56 time=31.8 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f20.1e100.net (173.194.35.180): icmp_req=3 ttl=56 time=31.4 ms
64 bytes from muc03s02-in-f20.1e100.net (173.194.35.180): icmp_req=4 ttl=56 time=32.0 ms
^C
--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.405/31.714/32.009/0.222 ms
natirips@nati-desk:~$ 
 

Look, maps.dswp.de is faster than www.google.com. :shock:

wurst · **Posted:** 03.16.12

no all servers respond the same fast, its the way through the internet.
however, ping dswp.de
(just made everything pimmelable...)

natirips · **Posted:** 03.16.12

ATM dswp.de, www.dswp.de and maps.dswp.de all have cca 42 ping, www.google.com has cca 31.

I suppose it depends on many factors as usual with networks.

wurst · **Posted:** 03.16.12

Google does Round Robin DNS just to notice.
If u want u can ping teh whole list, sure u find someone closer.
Check it with nslookup

Latency is about Hops and Bottlenecks and PacketLenghts and such.
When compared to a street: Ping is the length and Bandwith is the width.
When compared to a dick: Bandwith is the meat and Ping might be teh pressure.
Im not the qualified philopher to answer this truely.

Theres anyways 11 ping to dswp, 5 are between cable modem and next hop.
from then 5ms later it leaves the provider IN frankfurt. they have backbone.

Im having dsl and cable, cable delivers the far better and stable ping.
DSL is average 22, at least it was like that last 2 years.
It could wank from 14 to 400, fail some days and such.

loook at my internet, my internet is amazing...

Who is online